| Digital Art / Drawings & Paintings / Animals | ©2011-2013 *tiffanyturrill |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |
Basically, I think you are correct, but what is proof? I believe many dinos had extra scales and spines and scutes and I can point to those that do have those decorations as proof of the possibilities many more kinds did, but I cannot prove the dinos I draw had them.
I find a problem with what a lot of scientists see as proof of something. "Tyrannosaurs could see good and were tall. This proves they were scavengers!" This is a condensation of a theory one of Jack Horner's cohorts put forth. What does the eyes theory really prove? Nothing at all. Good eyesight and a tall platform would indicate a rex COULD scavenge, nothing more...and nothing less.
I am glad to see you put your thoughts in the maybe category. This indicates sound thinking.
[link]